Digger Is...(massive spoilers ahead)
[I was contacted by someone who suggested I share my Facebook and Letterboxd review more widely, so here it is. You've been warned.]
Digger is...
1) absolutely NOT a failure. I can only assume that the smart folks I know and follow who have written off this film as a misbegotten catastrophe got through only the first 30 minutes or so--during which, admittedly, the tone and the pace and the staging of the movie’s story never truly synced up, and several comic set-ups really didn’t deliver--and, as soon as the miniature tree fell over and the stagehand’s head popped up in front of what what was revealed to us in the viewing audience as a stage screen, meaning we were watching a movie about a play, simply wrote the move off then and there. I can come up with no other explanation for why a film with a genuinely brilliant science-fiction premise, but with an undeniably less than brilliant execution--it was too long, and some of the tableaus that were clearly supposed to be riffing on us watching play actors watch something the audience couldn’t see offstage were more distracting than clever--should have received such a terrible critical lambasting. This is not a great movie, but it is a movie loaded with greatness, just one that failed to make it all work.
2) a movie that probably won’t provide Cruise with the Oscar he deserves, though not for lack of trying. Among other things, as I alluded to above, the film’s rhythm and sound design prevented what could have been some truly hilarious comic moments from landing. Cruise’s character Curtis Markson at one point complains that the play is failing at satire and is playing its horrific story of an environmental apocalypse as farce, but--unless this is yet ANOTHER layer of satire in this complicated, ambitious, flawed film?--the movie only very rarely grants its central character any moments of true farcical darkness. A different approach to the whole production might have made Cruise’s performance of Curtis’s performance of Digger Rockwell’s terrifyingly honest and hilariously fanatical speech about how the oil industry’s destruction of the world was all done in the name of freedom, and ought to be forgiven for everything accordingly, the absolute centerpiece of the film. But while Cruise may still win the Oscar statue, I really don’t think anyone will end up considering this movie one that showcases his acting talent, the way Magnolia or Jerry McGuire or Born on the Fourth of July did; the scenes just weren’t assembled in such a way to serve the big moments his character had.
3) a movie that I will be happily arguing about with anyone who wants to for years to come. I have to reach back to Kubrick’s Dr. Strangelove, Terry Gilliam’s Brazil, Proyas’s Dark City (all of which, let me be clear, are better movies overall than Inarritu’s Digger), or similar films to come up with cinematic tale that has SO MUCH going on in its narrative, in its performances, in its whole mise-en-scene. The mysteries abound. Is the water dripping through the sets part of the play-within-the-movie structure, or is it just water dripping through the theater where the play-withing-the-movie is being performed, and what are we to think about that either way? Is Jesse Plemons’s Kenny Rockwell a hero (he found Curtis’s lost daughter!) or a villain (he took a defiant independent play, “Fossil Fools,” that gave a middle finger to all that had destroyed the planet, and made it into a massive production which the audience responds to hysterically as a sop to make them content with the shattered authoritarianism they now all live under!)? I don’t know! And a movie that so confidently--if imperfectly--presents unknowable stuff like this to us, the viewing audience, deserves massive praise.
4) not a movie that I can give five stars to, but a movie that will definitely be on my Top Ten of the year list. Worth nearly $40 to buy three tickets for Melissa and I and our youngest to all see it together on the big screen and then talk about all night afterwards? Absolutely.
